Alexa for Firefox… but not

July 18, 2007 by Wolfie · Comment
Filed under: Blogging, Internet, Technology 

Saw this post on the Calacanis weblog (yes, I know, I read the Calacanis weblog. I can’t help it. It’s road-accident blogging; you just gotta stop and look) and thought “Yay! Now I can see what all the fuss is about with Alexa“.

Downloaded the toolbar, installed it, worked fine. Gives you a bunch of related links to sites you visit, gives you an Alexa ranking for the site, adds another search option. Bunch of good stuff.

Five minutes after installing it, Firefox tells me that its updated to version 2.0.0.5 and needs to restart. After restarting, it tells me that the Alexa plug-in is not compatible with this version of Firefox so will be disabled. Damn!

So, will it be another five year wait before it’s working again?

20/7 UPDATE: No, we don’t have to wait five years. Just check out this entry and follow the instructions, or go straight to this site to download the extension you need. I’ve tried it and it’s working fine on my system. Take the usual care, though, if you load it on to yours because it has the potential to break everything the next time something gets updated.

Wesley Crusher drops the ball on viral marketing.

June 5, 2007 by Wolfie · Comment
Filed under: Blogging, Internet 

Anyone who’s read The Wolf’s Howl more than once (thanks, by the way) will know from this post that it’s Wesley Crusher - Wil Wheaton in the real world - who got me into blogging. His was the first blog that I read with any great regularity and I still do; I think he’s great at making his everyday life (touched as it may be with a bit of Hollywood glamour) real for his readers. I recommend you read him.

Constant Readers will also know that a little while ago I responded to some posts by Jason Calacanis about PayPerPost. I couldn’t get past the idea that here was a man criticising bloggers for using their blogs to earn money, while at the same time using his blog to earn money. It didn’t seem quite right, but the main thing that I objected to was that he called PayPerPost evil. As I said at the time:

“Evil is Hitler. Evil is people dying of starvation in the Third World while the West gets morbidly obese. Taking money for talking about products is journalism.”

Now I’m afraid that poor Wil has joined that clan. In this post (a sequel to this one where he was trying to drum up votes for himself on Bloggers Choice Awards ), he says that PayPerPost is “at best deeply unethical, and at worst damn close to evil”. You see, there’s that e word again.

I’m sorry, but I can’t equate a bunch of bloggers taking payment to write about a product or service as evil. Let’s have a little perspective here, people, shall we.

I don’t get behind this idea that blogs are somehow sacrosanct and free of outside influence, that they are somehow pure. Let’s take Wil, for instance, he’s been using advertising on his site for a while. This post details his reasons for taking it down, but the upshot is that he is not averse to earning money from his blog. Calacanis has all sorts of links around his blog that earn him revenue, as does Mike Arrington (TechCrunch) - who just recently at MESH called PayPerPost CEO Ted Murphy “the most evil man in the room” - that e word yet again.

In the print media, advertising space is quite often sold off the back of editorial; this editorial is not always identified as being paid for. Likewise, I’m sure there’s many a product manager who’s been told “Well, we’ll run the piece if you pay us £XXX to cover colour separation charges”. It’s been going on since Man invented the printing press, so why should the Internet and blogs be any different?

“Disclosure”, I can hear you shouting from all sides. “What about disclosure?” Well, now this is a thorny issue as I have read comments by some (not necessarily PayPerPost Posties) who say that they would not disclose when - or if - their blog has sponsored content. However, in a section called Requirements of Note, PayPerPost say on their site - before you even sign up to be a Postie - that:

“You must be prepared to disclose your relationship with PayPerPost advertisers and advise your readers of any sponsored content via a disclosure policy or on a per post basis.”

They also say:

“It’s up to you to pick the Opportunities that best suit you and your blog. If it doesn’t feel right, if you don’t own the product, or if you can’t be honest we ask you to pass on the Opportunity. Dishonest or completely off-topic posts can ultimately hurt your blog’s credibility. We strongly encourage you to only take opportunities that relate to you.”

There will always be some bloggers who do not disclose all of their sponsored content, - or who will alter their opinion just to get paid - but they are by no means all part of the Postie clan and by no means all individuals without vested business interests.

I think a little perspective needs to be taken. If you’re reading about a product or service on someone’s blog there’s always the possibility that their opinion is coloured by some outside influence; they may be getting paid for the blog, sure, but there may be all sorts of other reasons why they have the opinion they do. If you’re going to base your buying decision on what you read on the Internet, then you need to make sure that you’ve read lots of opinions, including the magazines and periodicals that deal with that market sector.

Every development in technology eventually leads to a widespread business application; now it’s the turn of blogging.

- - -

I suppose, for the sake of clarity, that I should disclose at this point that I am not a PayPerPost Postie. I do not work for PayPerPost. I know one of the guys that works there, but that’s it. This blog is not sponsored, this post is not sponsored. Any links I provide are there because I think you might find them interesting. I do have a link to the company that I work for, but I do not earn commission from anyone clicking that link. Thank you.

A little Hawaiian lesson (are you listening Jason?)

June 3, 2007 by Wolfie · 1 Comment
Filed under: Blogging, Internet 

Source

In Hawaiian thinking, words have spiritual or divine power, and aloha and mahalo are among the most sacred and powerful.

Say them often as they can be life-transforming and -enhancing. Be careful to use them ONLY if you truly feel mahalo or aloha within. Do not exploit these words for personal gain, and neither cheapen, nor trivialize their use by verbalizing them carelessly or without sincerity.

Aloha and mahalo are ineffable, indescribable, and undefinable with words alone; to be understood, they must be experienced.

On a spiritual level, aloha is an invocation of the Divine and mahalo is a Divine blessing. Both are acknowledgments of the Divinity that dwells within and without.

- - -

So, not really appropriate for a glorified search engine, then.

Jason Calacanis vs PayPerPost. Why?

April 29, 2007 by Wolfie · 1 Comment
Filed under: Blogging, Internet 

I started writing this as a comment to this post on CodeHappy, but as it went on, it got longer and longer so I thought I’d pull it out and make a proper post of it:

I’d never heard of this Jason Calacanis guy until today but jeez, what a guy(!). I wasted some time reading his various posts about PayPerPost and you guys really do seem to have upset him; his morals and ethics are obviously highly offended. Oh wait, they can’t be - he’s doing just the same thing.

He doesn’t seem to realise that this is the real world; “covert marketing” as he insists on calling it has been around since there have been products to sell. The only difference now is that blogs and the Internet make it all more widespread.

At one point is he (or one of the blogs he links to, I forgot which and I’ve lost the link) makes the comparison with product placement in movies. Is there really ANY part of the Net that isn’t just one big advert? If anything mentions a company or product, don’t you think - as an intelligent individual - there’s at least a chance this is an advert?

And what of the PayPerPost posties? Jason seems to be calling them - by association - horrible and evil. Really? Just for taking a few dollars to talk about a product? If I recommend a product to a friend ‘cos I think it’s good, does it really matter if it’s by telling them directly or by putting it on a page on a website, where other people might read it too? I don’t think that makes me evil. Evil is Hitler. Evil is people dying of starvation in the Third World while the West gets morbidly obese. Taking money for talking about products is journalism.

Jason also talks about disclosure. He says that every one who is paid to blog should disclose this fact in the blog. There may be some value to this but if you’re going to start doing it with blogs, then shouldn’t you do it everywhere? I see blogs as being similar to newspapers - just with more staff writers. Does every newspaper journo disclose all the various little deals that he makes with companies to “enhance” their reviews? How many magazines sell editorial content along with display advertising - content that is not disclosed as bought space? The PayPerPost posties make the decision to disclose or not on a post-by-post basis; they’re the ones writing, it’s their decision.

So Jason, leave the guys alone. You’re only worried ‘cos they’re muscling in on your action.

(Just so’s you know, Jason, I was not paid by PayPerPost to write this post, I am not one of their posties or one of their advertisers but I do know Peter Wright. OK? Thanks.)

  • Wolfs Stuff

    See my Amazon Wish List

    Follow me on Twitter

    Follow me on FriendFeed

  • Wolfs Helpers