Same old story…
Apparently, the stewards at Sunday’s race missed two things that are obvious in this video. Firstly, Hamilton IS marginally ahead in the run down to the chicane; unfortunately, he’s on the outside, which is not the racing line for that corner. And secondly, he immediately gives the place back to Raikonnen - as they go down the pit straight, the McLaren is fully behind the weaving Ferrari.
McLaren have appealed against the penalty, but their appeal may not be allowable under FIA rules; it is unclear whether a time penalty (as opposed to a points penalty) can be appealed. Perhaps people wouldn’t be crying “FOUL” quite so loudly if it hadn’t been Ferrari that benefited from Hamilton’s demotion to third. After all, over recent seasons the FIA, and Max Moseley particularly, do seem to have been more than generous to the Italian team.
Brief notes
1. I’ve been talking this week with an old friend from school, and one of the subjects that came up was names and how we’d both not really liked ours for one reason or another. But having read this story, I can see that we got off easy. I mean, I thought Moon Unit, Fifi Trixibelle and Zowie were bad enough - but Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii? Come on, how stoned do you have to be to lump your daughter with a name like that?
2. The BPI has pressurised the Government into pressurising the major UK ISP’s to make it their problem to deal with illegal online file-sharing. So, if you’ve been sharing files illegally you might soon be getting a letter from your ISP to tell you to stop it. I’m not sure that I agree it is the ISP’s problem - what about the people that produce the software that make it possible?
3. It’s official; Max Moseley is not a Nazi. Son of a fascist, bad for motorsport in general and Formula One in particular, an embarrassment to his family, and £60,000 richer after the verdict - but not a Nazi.
4. Poor old David Cameron, Conservative leader and (in)famous cyclist. He’s had his bike stolen while out shopping. Wonder if it’s up on eBay yet?
5. Fans of Beaker should check out this clip. Priceless.
Thank you, News of the World
I’d just like to take this opportunity to thank the News of the World (a tawdry Sunday tabloid, for those of you who are lucky enough not to have heard of it) for bringing us so many lurid details of Max Moseley’s sex life.
Subsequent to the NOTW publishing details and video of Max’s not-Nazi-at-all BDSM session with five London-based ladies of a certain type, we’re now having to suffer blow-by-blow (ahem) accounts in Court of what did or did not happen. Max, president of the FIA - the governing body of world motorsport - is suing because the NOTW accused him of being a Nazi and he says he’s not. Either way, I could have done without hearing all the gory details, thanks very much.
Can’t wait to hear what comes up in Court tomorrow!
Brief notes
1. What do you do when your helicopter breaks down in Snowdonia? Call in the RAF to airlift it back to base for repairs. I think this qualifies as “amazing footage of the week”.
2. Congratulations to Lewis Hamilton for winning the British GP this weekend; he’s now back in the running for the championship. Commiserations to David Coulthard for crashing out early in his last ever home race. And well done (!) to Bernie for finally doing what he’s been trying to do for years and taking the GP away from Silverstone. Given that one of his objections has always been the lack of facilities at Silverstone, I’m not sure how he thinks that Donnington is a suitable replacement, when it needs even more work than Silverstone.
I don’t know who it is at the BRDC that Bernie doesn’t like, but there’s obviously someone! Or perhaps it’s just that the BRDC told him where he could stick his outrageous demands for money. The sooner that the premier class of motorsport is not controlled by such a devious, manipulative and two-faced person as Bernie Ecclestone, the better that it will be. Between him and Max “not a Nazi, but definitely the son of a fascist” Moseley, the sport long ago descending into farce and it needs to be stopped.
3. You’ve probably seen much talk of this around the Net over the last few days, but in case you missed it a judge in the US has ruled that Google must hand over a log that contains details of the videos that You Tube users have watched. The log, which “contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details” has to be handed over to Viacom in an argument over copyright infringement.
Quite rightly, privacy groups are up in arms that this information is to be handed over, as it contains data that could allow individuals to be identified and is a massive breach of privacy. But what worries me, additionally, is why this information is being kept in the first place. Yes, I can understand you want to know which videos are popular, etc, but why do you need to keep personal information? Isn’t it enough to know that a video has been watched 100,000 times? Why do you need to know which 100,000 people watched it?
There has been some speculation that Viacom may use this information in an attempt to prosecute individual users, so I’d recommend that if you’re a You Tube user you only watch non-copyright infringing clips from now on.
4. In a related issue, Virgin Media is warning file-sharers that they risk being taken to court if they illegally download music. It’s part of a BPI initiative to stop the illegal downloading of music by making the ISP’s responsible for it. Years ago we had “Home taping is killing music (and it’s illegal)” stickers on LPs and cassettes; now we have its online equivalent. But the “Home taping” campaign back then was based on a fallacy, and it’s the same today; music was never at risk. What was at risk was the strangle hold that the music industry had on it, while they milked it for every penny they could. They can’t (and never have been able to) move with the times and want to protect a profit margin that really doesn’t belong to them anymore. If it was all about protecting the artists, as people like the BPI would have us believe, I could give it more support but it isn’t; it’s all about record label profits.
If I download an album through iTunes or any of the other online music stores, rather than buying the CD, why should I have to pay the same price as the CD? There’s no physical product that has to be manufactured and shipped to a retail outlet, after all, and my consumer experience is reduced because there’s no cover artwork or inlay card, etc and no handy CD to enable me to take my music on the road with me. Why, then, was my recent purchase of Melody Gardot’s Worrisome Heart only £0.30 more for the CD than it would have been for a download version? (And, in fact, at the moment it’s actually cheaper for the CD!)
The music industry needs to wake up to reality and rather than going after people who illegally download music, they should be making it much easier to download music legally. Which must also include getting rid of DRM completely, and making artist’s back catalogue’s more readily available.
All the excitement is off the track
There’s lots of flak surrounding Max Moseley (FIA President) at the moment, over allegations that have been made about events in his private life. He’s called a special meeting of the FIA, after four of the major teams in F1 called on him to explain himself, and apparently he’s been asked to stay away from this weekend’s Grand Prix in Bahrain.
I’ve no idea if the allegations (supposedly about “a Nazi-style orgy in a torture dungeon”) are true, and even if they are it is his private life so shouldn’t have any bearing on his job, but for me the best part about the whole thing is the only comment I’ve read from Max himself is to deny any Nazi connotations. Which seems to imply the rest of it is true.
Ewwwwww.
Update: there’s even a video. Although - as is the way of these things - it could be anyone. And thankfully it doesn’t go into detail.
Wolfs Stuff
Wolfs Helpers
-
